Banner Image

IPSWHT Integrated Petrophysics - How to Derive and Use Capillary Pressure Saturation Height Functions

Explains the industry wide saturation-height method and shows how to derive and integrate ALL routine core plugs and logs correctly for a SCAL, NMR or log based robust capillary pressure Saturation-Height Function

 

Contents 5 Day

Logging on to this course

Other courses by Deakin,  PETROPHYSICS Pty Ltd..

Daily Schedule
Intro: our petrophysical objective..

Course Objectives

Intro: Reservoir schematic (initial conditions)

Intro: Pre-emptive action for Badhole

Intro: What we need to know, everywhere in our reservoir

Intro: Conventional Core Analysis (CCA) – what we get

Intro: Core Cleaning and Drying

Intro: Gas expansion porosity Boyle’s Law Porosimeter

Intro: Why core data rules

Special Core Analysis – what we get

What Special core with what Special Log gives what Special answer?

MICROPRACTICAL  Select the mud, core, log and lab test requirements for an optimal Swht evaluation

Pre-requisties: Even in good quality reservoir porosity error is amplified via Sw, k and Netpay

WHY Saturation Height (Swht)
WHAT is Capillary Pressure (Pc)

Lab to Reservoir: Initial conditions capillary pressure does not depend upon rock quality – Pc is created by buoyancy

Swht is IMPORTANT!

DAY1 Practical

Which Pc-Sw curve?

Determine FWL

Pc: WFTs provide FWL, Ht, Pc=0: Actual Reservoir Capillary Pressure, Height above free water level & Mobile Fluid Type

Pc: Excess Pressure = Capillary Pressure
The Hydrophilic Logging Tool : 2 pressures, One depth à FWL à Swht

MICROPRACTICAL. FWL from single WFT point

What is Capillary Pressure?

Swpc: Capillary Pressure, wetting phase (water) saturation decreases with increasing Pc

Swpc: Poor Reservoir Qualities retain more water and have thick Transition Zones

Capillary Pressure Saturations – 4 controls on Sh

Lab àReservoir – what height gives the same Sw as the Pc in your lab function? (not the same Pc, the same Sw)
You will need Swht during log analysis if..

Sw log analysis (Swrt) Uncertainty Increased by
..which add value to Swht

Non Archie conditions complicate Swrt
..which adds value to Swht

Is Swht better than Swrt? Malay Basin shaly sands

MICROPRACTICAL

Swht modelling should use SCAL, RCA, Logs and possibly seismic to populate the geo model

 

ESSENTIAL PRE-REQUISITES

 

Swht pre-requisites: Applying Swht via RCA requires machine sampled (whole rock) RCA

Swht Lab Prep: Consider cutting rotary side-wall cores after main HPV units have been identified to improve log inputs

Swht pre-requisites: RCA

Swht pre-requisites:  Core–Log Equality,  Machine Sampled RCA

Swht pre-requisites: for Integration: Core = Log

Swht pre-requisites: Reservoir Types: Petrophysical Data Acquisition for Swht fails if..

 

END DAY 1

DAY Practical

 

Day1 Recap

Swht Lab Prep: RCA, typical laboratory process

Swht Lab Prep: The same cleaning & drying for SCAL & RCA

Swht Lab Prep: correct your RCA to Overburden Porosity Uniaxial Compaction Correction

Swht Lab Prep: Overburden Porosity simple but often wrong, check yours.

This software package demo well is wrong! Core=24, Log=22

Swht : Porosity measurements compared

MICROPRACTICAL – Matrix porosity Error in tight carbonates

IPSWHT – Evaluation Sequence

 

RESERVOIR TYPES and RESERVOIR ROCK TYPES

 

What is your Petrophysical Reservoir Type?

What is your Reservoir Type? Contd..

What is your Reservoir Type? Contd..

RESERVOIR ROCK TYPES (RRTs)

Reservoir Rock Typing (RRT) for Swht – Process 1, 2, 3

Reservoir Rock Typing (RRT) for Swht

RRT for Swht
Data should cover cores and logs

RRT for Swht: Why you need Rock Typing or use BVH for k

RRT for Swht contd..  Carbonate cautions

RRT for Swht – carbonate reality can be complex!

RRT for Swht contd..

RRT for Swht: mercury injection data reveals PTSD

RRT for Swht: vugs often invalidate Swht calculations. Why?

Reservoir Rock Typing for Swht – Try J trends first

The Swht Function: cornerstone of the Reservoir Rock Type Equation Set

Summary – Reservoir Rock Typing for Swht

DAY Practical

IPSWHT – Evaluation Sequence

 

ACQUIRING LABORATORY CAPILLARY PRESSURE DATA

 

SCAL Sample Selection and Apparatus

Swht Lab Prep: is core Fit for Purpose?

Swht Lab Prep: sample selection for a given Pc high Surface Area rocks retain more water

Swht Lab Prep: How NOT to pick SCAL plugs: Are Pc Plugs Representative?  Have Anomalous plugs been identified?

Swht Lab Prep: How to pick SCAL plugs

Swht Lab Prep: Are you creating misleading input data?

MICROPRACTICAL
Hydrocarbon Pore Volume indicates permeability Chart K-4

Porous plate apparatus    ..the gold standard

Porous plate: theory, simple

Porous plate: core overburden Pc & electrical properties

Porous plate: Problems and Advantages

 

END DAY 2

DAY Practical

 

 

Day2 Recap

Day2 Recap contd..

Centrifuge: apparatus

Centrifuge: RPM à Pressure (force per area)

Centrifuge:  Process1

Centrifuge:  Process2

Centrifuge: Process3  Centrifuge theory – complicated!

Centrifuge: Sw distribution – observed not calculated

A Centrifuge sample is like a mini-reservoir with a steep Pc-Sw gradient

Centrifuge: Problems and Advantages

Mercury: apparatus, small irregular samples

Mercury: apparatus, regular core plugs

Mercury: Process

Mercury: Theory. Each Pc has a corresponding Pore Throat Radius

Mercury: problems and advantages

What height is 200psi Pc lab equivalent to?

MICROPRACTICAL  Which Lab Pc experiment do you prefer and why?

IPSWHT – Evaluation Sequence

Lab Data Corrections

Lab Corrections:  Lab data corrections, order

Lab Corrections: Mercury Closure/conformance

Lab Corrections: Mercury Pe and Pd

Lab Corrections: Reservoir overburden stress (all data)

Lab Corrections: Mercury, Clay Bound Water correction

Lab Corrections: Mercury capillary pressure data correction for ClayBW only

Lab corrections: What happens if you don’t correct Mercury?

DAY Practical

Mercury data corrections

Lab Corrections: What is the Capillary End Effect (CEE)? Centrifuge only

Lab Corrections: CEE corrections

Lab Recommended Practice to reduce CEE

Vetting Lab results: basic questions

Vetting Lab results: Porous Plate

Vetting Lab results: Centrifuge

Vett lab results: Is stress vs compaction smooth?

Vett lab results: Is Sw vs J or Pc smooth?

Vetting Lab results: Mercury

Vett lab results: Is k vs Displacement Pressure (Pd) on trend?

Vett lab results: Is RQI vs Swi on trend?

 

Swht QUICKLOOK (pre Function fit)

Swht Quicklook: arrange your lab Pc data like this

Swht quicklook: Redisplay lab Pc results as a simple Sw-Ht grid

Swht: Capillary Pressure Saturations may be inaccurate

Swht quicklook: Does Swht = Swik4? kair from log derived Ø & Sw irreducible, Chart K4

 

END DAY 3

DAY3 Practical

Quick Look Swht methods

 

Day3 Recap

IPSWHT – Evaluation Sequence

 

HOW TO DERIVE A LABORATORY BASED CAPILLARY PRESSURE SATURATION HEIGHT FUNCTION

 

Fit Functions

BVW FOIL Function – Bulk Volume Water, a simple function of Height (Pc) ?

BVW FOIL Function – easy to understand and use IF one rock type

BVW FOIL Function – process..

MICROPRACTICAL  Core analysis indicates Swi

Modified J – Deakin. What is J?

Modified J – Deakin J collapses diverse samples onto one trend

Modified J – Deakin. What is J? Summary

Modified J – Deakin, lab data, observe Jsw1

Modified J – Deakin, lab data fit J-Sw  Swj

Modified J – Summary Process for Swj

Modified J – Deakin, key check plots

Modified J  example
Sw & HPV predicted by Swj vs core plug Sw_msrd

Modified J – Rock typing with J for geo-models, J Types

Modifed J – Can logs identify your RTypes or JTypes?
Logs could not identify these two trends so the average was used

Modified J – summary schematic                SPE39761

DAY Practical

How to Use Capillary Pressure Data

MICROPRACTICAL  Sw: Calculate Swi_nmr from Free Fluid and Øt. What assumptions have you made?

Skelt-Harrison

Skelt Harrison – process

Brooks Corey

Lambda

Thomeer Analysis Carbonate MICP data
Pore Throat Size Distribution, Rock Typing, Sw

Thomeer Equation Parameters
Determine bvmax, Pd, G for each pore system

Function Summary For use in petrophysics and geo-model software

IPSWHT – Evaluation Sequence

 

POSITION YOUR LAB RESULTS INTO THE RESERVOIR

Lab à Reservoir –  to position your lab function into the reservoir the Pc=0, FWL must be estimated

Lab à Reservoir – what height gives the same Sw as the Pc in your lab function? (not the same Pc, the same Sw)
Lab à Reservoir – IFT*cosq uncertain especially water drive, oil

Lower Interfacial Tension IFT= Increased HPV

Lab à Reservoir – IFT typical values

Lab à Reservoir: Is your reservoir non strongly water wet?  ..especially water drive oil?

Lab à Reservoir: Wetting preferences dictate the amount and distribution of oil and water within the pore network

Wettability – is oil or water attracted to the rock?

DAY4 Practical: How to Use Capillary Pressure Data

Lab à Reservoir: Is your reservoir non-strongly water wet?

Lab à Reservoir – oil, mixed and oil wet. When..?

Lab à Reservoir : now we know height we know J.. for every plug

Lab à Reservoir – J gives every RCA plug has its own Sw, Swj

Swht integration:
Log  Ø, Sw, k = Core Ø, Sw, k

 

END DAY 4

DAY Practical

 

xx Day4 Recap

c:\data\courses\zzMRIL.avi Click to play

Something to think about.. Do perched water contacts violate capillary pressure Saturation-height assumptions?

IPSWHT – Evaluation Sequence

 

HOW TO DERIVE A LOG BASED SATURATION HEIGHT FUNCTION

 

Different options for log based Swht functions

Log-based Swht Functions without Sw logs input 1)

Log-based Swht Functions without Sw logs input 2)

Lucia’s Carbonate generic Swht functions, interparticle porosity

Swht Sensitivites xls. How does each input affect BVH?  Powerful

Log Based Saturation Height Functions
Resistivity Based Functions

Log-based Swht: Resistivity log Swht functions

Log-based Swht: Typical causes of Swht≠Swrt

Log based Swht – Reconcile and improve with Swlogs

Log Based Saturation Height Functions
Volume Based Log Functions

Volume log methods

Volume log Swht – Magnetic Resonance Swi

NMR Swht – Each T2 bin, is a Pc bin, is a Ht bin so… bins fill with increasing Ht

Volume log Swht – NMR, think Swht

Log-based Swht functions – Careful with vugs & BVH! Can NMR find vugs?

Vugs, Swht and HPV

Lab to Reservoir: Swrt  agrees with Swht

Log-based Swht functions – Ecoscope, Sigma BVW saline, microporous carbonates

Swht equation chain sensitivities xls – Locate feasible error

IPSWHT – Evaluation Sequence

 

Swht APPLICATIONS: SOME USES OF CAPILLARY PRESSURE SATURATION HEIGHT FUNCTIONS

 

J Type iteration:  J value vs. Sw trends can be used to define separate rocktypes (J Types), a practical approach

Applications: Core-Log n

Swht application – how to use Swht to calibrate logs
Core-log common format ‘n’ definition plot

Swht application – how to use Swht to calibrate logs.
Use Swht on the Core-log common format ‘n’ definition plot

Swht: Capillary Pressure Sw and ‘n’

Swht summary SCAL à RCA à Logs à HPV  This is integration!

Swht application: This facies dismissed by buyer until rigorous Swht was applied

Net: Logs = non-pay or marginal, core = pay: Tested 11mmscfpd. This facies 35% Bulk Rock Vol.

 

Swht: One Common Use Equation Set. Log and Geo-model HPVs, kabs, koil. Core = Log = Geomodel (black)

Applications: Geo model

Geo-model: A Consistent Geo.model

Applications: OWC rise

Saturation height users:
Systematic errors which ruin your geo.models (chronological)

 

END

BACKUP